Pursuant to Rhode Island Law, a spouse obligation to pay alimony terminates upon the remarriage of the recipient spouse. A property settlement agreement in Rhode Island can specifically state that alimony would continue after remarriage. I have very rarely seen a Rhode Island Property Settlement Agreement that includes Alimony after a recipient spouse remarriage.
Alimony
The Missouri Court of Appeals determined that “In order to rebut the statutory presumption that maintenance terminates upon the receiving spouse’s remarriage, a dissolution decree must expressly refer to the receiving spouse’s possible future remarriage, and must expressly provide that maintenance payments shall continue beyond that contingency.” (Please note that a State Court Ruling of another state has no binding precedence on Rhode Island Courts) (also review for further information: Kansas City Divorce Attorney Mark Wortman)
Rhode Island alimony (spousal support)
“The defendant’s last claim is that the trial justice’s ruling has left her with no means of support. Alimony is a rehabilitative tool intended to provide temporary support until a spouse is self-sufficient, and is based purely on need. See D’Agostino v. D’Agostino, 463 A.2d 200, 202 (R.I.1983). This Court has stated that in awarding alimony, “[e]arnings [are] but one of a myriad of factors that the trial justice weigh[s] and evaluate[s] * * *. [He] also consider[s] the difference in earning power between plaintiff and defendant and weigh[s] defendant’s needs and circumstances against plaintiff’s ability to pay.” Whited v. Whited, 478 A.2d 567, 570 (R.I.1984). As long as the trial justice considers the statutory elements in § 15-5-16, this Court will not disturb the award or lack of award of alimony. The trial justice explicitly found that based on the weekly needs of plaintiff and the children, and plaintiff’s obligation to repair the marital domicile, plaintiff had no present capacity to pay alimony. Additionally, there was evidence that defendant had worked throughout the marriage as a bus driver, and had some advanced training as a medical assistant.” 749 A.2d 577 (2000) Michael J. BERARD v. Patricia A. BERARD. .Supreme Court of Rhode Island. April 28, 2000. Present WEISBERGER, C.J., and LEDERBERG, BOURCIER, FLANDERS, and GOLDBERG, JJ. Marc B. Press, Lise M. Iwon, Wakefield, for plaintiff. Patricia J. Berard Pro Se. OPINION PER CURIAM.